“Call First, Save Lives”: Implementation of Telephone Pre-Triage at the Local Health Unit of Braga and Future Perspectives for Access to the Emergency Department in Portugal

Authors

  • Sílvia Raquel Santos Escola de Medicina da Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal; Serviço de Patologia Clínica na Unidade Local de Saúde de Braga, Braga, Portugal https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3734-6830
  • Inês Gonçalves Mamede Escola de Medicina da Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0644-2282
  • Joana Carlos Alves Serviço de Urgência da Unidade Local de Saúde de Braga, Braga, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24950/rspmi.2835

Keywords:

Crowding, Emergency Medicine/methods, Emergency Service, Hospital, Hotlines, Patient Satisfaction, Primary Health Care, Telephone, Triage

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding and inadequate use are widespread challenges. Telephone triages (TTs) are among the most studied solutions. The Portuguese "Call First, Save Lives" (CFSL) innovative project implemented a pre-hospital telephone triage (SNS24) to optimize patient referral pathways (RPs). This study provides the first patient-centered integrated evaluation of its implementation at the Local Health Unit of Braga (LHUB).

Methods: A questionnaire was applied to a convenience sample of 128 adult patients attending the LHUB Emergency Department (July-September 2025), assessing sociodemographic characteristics, referral pathways and patient satisfaction. Clinical data and ED-episode outcomes were extracted from health records.

Results: A clear gap between the project's awareness (93.8%) and actual SNS24-referrals (24.2%) was found. Self-referral predominated (56.3%). Most patients (58.6%) did not contact the line, mentioning perceived urgency, undesirable operational barriers (such as excessive waits and unanswered calls) or simply not considering it. Understanding of the "Call First, Save Lives" benefits was limited, and satisfaction was low (2.98/5) and significantly associated with the RP (p=0.004).

            Primary care services (PCS) were largely bypassed, despite high Family Physician coverage (89.8%) and satisfaction (80.9%).

            Referral pathways did not influence waiting time or triage category. Older age was a significant predictor of not contacting (p=0.016) nor being referred by SNS24 (p=0.043).

Conclusion: The "Call First, Save Lives" project at the Local Health Unit of Braga still faces significant implementation challenges. Self-referral persists within a saturated system, where “calling first” has yet to demonstrate measurable impacts. Misconceptions about telephone triages and primary care service, along with limited health literacy, sustain direct ED access. These findings underscore the need to optimize SNS24 performance, triage algorithms and patient engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Berchet C. Emergency care services: trends, drivers and interventions to manage the demand. OECD Health Working Papers No. 83. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015.

2. Goiana-da-Silva F, Costa S, Malcata F, Sá J, Vasconcelos R, Cabral M, et al. Addressing the overuse of hospital emergency departments in the Portuguese NHS: a new paradigm. Front Public Health. 2025;12:1444951. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444951

3. Pearce S, Marchand T, Shannon T, Ganshorn H, Lang E. Emergency department crowding: an overview of reviews describing measures causes, and harms. Intern Emerg Med. 2023;18:1137–58. doi:10.1007/s11739-023-03239-2

4. Di Somma S, Paladino L, Vaughan L, Lalle I, Magrini L, Magnanti M. Overcrowding in emergency department: an international issue. Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10:171–5. doi:10.1007/s11739-014-1154-8

5. Sartini M, Carbone A, Demartini A, Giribone L, Oliva M, Spagnolo AM, et al. Overcrowding in emergency department: causes, consequences, and solutions—a narrative review. Healthcare. 2022;10:1625. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091625

6. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n.o 438/2023, de 15 de dezembro. Diário da República [Internet]. 2023 Dec 15;241(1):46–9 [cited 2025 May 12]. Available from: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/portaria/438-2023-261867084.

7. Bunn F, Byrne G, Kendall S. The effects of telephone consultation and triage on healthcare use and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:956–61.

8. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n.o 336/2024, de 19 de dezembro. Diário da República [Internet]. 2024 Dec 19;246(1):53–6 [cited 2025 May 12]. Available from: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/portaria/336-2024-900706899.

9. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

10. Thierrin C, Augsburger A, Dami F, Monney C, Staeger P, Clair C. Impact of a telephone triage service for non-critical emergencies in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0249287. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249287

11. Roivainen P, Hoikka MJ, Ala-Kokko TI, Kääriäinen M. Patient satisfaction with telephone care assessment among patients with non-urgent prehospital emergency care issues: A cross-sectional study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2021;59:101070. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101070

12. Ferreira BD, Neto CP, Loureiro R, Almeida C. Fatores determinantes na procura de cuidados de saúde a um SUB, por utentes de uma USF. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2024;40:432–42. doi:10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13987

13. Dixe M, Passadouro R, Peralta T, Ferreira C, Lourenço G, Sousa P. Determinants of non-urgent emergency department use. Rev Enferm Ref. 2018;4:41–52. doi:10.12707/RIV17095

14. Unwin M, Kinsman L, Rigby S. Why are we waiting? Patients’ perspectives for accessing emergency department services with non-urgent complaints. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016;29:3–8. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2016.09.003

15. Zinger ND, Blomberg SN, Lippert F, Collatz Christensen H. Satisfaction of 30 402 callers to a medical helpline of the Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e029801. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029801

16. Riiskjaer E, Ammentorp J, Kofoed P-E. The value of open-ended questions in surveys on patient experience: number of comments and perceived usefulness from a hospital perspective. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24:509–16. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzs039

17. Simas A, Amorim N, Cabrita C, Veloso R, Morais J, Suzano R. Comportamento do utilizador do serviço de urgência do Hospital da Horta-Açores. Rev Port Med Interna. 2025;32:12-9.

18. Bujang MA, Omar ED, Foo DHP, Hon YK. Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire. Restor Dent Endod. 2024;49:e3. doi:10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3

19. Grech V, Calleja N. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Parametric vs. non-parametric tests. Early Hum Dev. 2018;123:48–9. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.04.014

20. Jung S. Stratified Fisher’s exact test and its sample size calculation. Biom J. 2014;56:129–40. doi:10.1002/bimj.201300048

21. McHugh ML. The Chi-square test of independence. Biochem Med. 2013;143–9. doi:10.11613/BM.2013.018

22. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1373–9. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3

23. Serviço Nacional de Saúde. Portal da Transparência. Atendimentos em Urgência Hospitalar por Triagem de Manchester [Hospital Emergency Department Attendances by Manchester Triage] [Internet]. Lisbon: SNS; [cited 2025 October 4]. Available from: https://transparencia.sns.gov.pt/explore/dataset/atendimentos-em-urgencia-triagem-manchester/table/?disjunctive.regiao&disjunctive.institucao&sort=tempo&refine.regiao=Regi%C3%A3o+de+Sa%C3%BAde+Norte&q=braga.

24. Botelho A, Dias IC, Fernandes T, Pinto LMC, Teixeira J, Valente M, et al. Overestimation of health urgency as a cause for emergency services inappropriate use: Insights from an exploratory economics experiment in Portugal. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27:1031–41. doi:10.1111/hsc.12720

25. Carret ML, Fassa AC, Domingues MR. Inappropriate use of emergency services: a systematic review of prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saude Publica. 2009;25:7–28. doi:10.1590/S0102-311X2009000100002

26. Godinho de Sousa A, Dos Santos Carneiro CA. Doentes Não Urgentes no Serviço de Urgência de um Hospital Português: Motivos e Características de Utilização. Acta Med Port. 2025;38:708–17. doi:10.20344/amp.23644

27. Tran DT, Gibson A, Randall D, Havard A, Byrne M, Robinson M, et al. Compliance with telephone triage advice among adults aged 45 years and older: an Australian data linkage study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:512. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2458-y

28. Serviço Nacional de Saúde (Portugal). Portal da Transparência. Atendimentos por tipo de urgência hospitalar [Attendances by type of hospital emergency] [Internet]. Lisbon: SNS; [cited 2025 October 4]. Available from: https://transparencia.sns.gov.pt/explore/dataset/atendimentos-por-tipo-de-urgencia-hospitalar-link/table/?sort=tempo&q=Braga.

29. Carrasqueiro S, Oliveira M, Encarnação P. Evaluation of telephone triage and advice services: a systematic review on methods, metrics and results. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:407–11.

30. Ismail SA, Gibbons DC, Gnani S. Reducing inappropriate accident and emergency department attendances: a systematic review of primary care service interventions. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63:e813-20. doi:10.3399/bjgp13X675395

31. Leibowitz R, Day S, Dunt D. A systematic review of the effect of different models of after-hours primary medical care services on clinical outcome, medical workload, and patient and GP satisfaction. Fam Pract. 2003;20:311–7. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmg313

32. Serviço Nacional de Saúde (Portugal). Portal da Transparência. Atividade Operacional do SNS 24 [Operational Activity of SNS 24] [Internet]. Lisbon: SNS; [cited 2025 October 4]. Available from: https://transparencia.sns.gov.pt/explore/dataset/atividade-operacional-do-sns-24/table/?sort=ordem.

33. Goiana-da-Silva F, Amorim-Lopes M, Correia F, Pereira J, Ribeiro A, Tude Graça D, et al. The growing pains of the 2024/2025 Portugal’s NHS telephone triage system national rollout. Front Public Health. Forthcoming 2025. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1694713.

34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Realising the Potential of Primary Health Care. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020.

35. Uscher-Pines L, Pines J, Kellermann A, Gillen E, Mehrotra A. Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:47–59.

36. McIntyre A, Janzen S, Shepherd L, Kerr M, Booth R. An integrative review of adult patient-reported reasons for non-urgent use of the emergency department. BMC Nurs. 2023;22:85. doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01251-7

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

1.
Santos SR, Gonçalves Mamede I, Carlos Alves J. “Call First, Save Lives”: Implementation of Telephone Pre-Triage at the Local Health Unit of Braga and Future Perspectives for Access to the Emergency Department in Portugal. RPMI [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 23 [cited 2026 Jun. 23];33(1):23-3. Available from: https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/2835