A influência da religião nas decisões de fim-de-vida
Palavras-chave:
Decisões de fim-de-vida, religião, ética, culturaResumo
As decisões de fim de vida (DFV) englobam as decisões de não
reanimação e as de suspensão ou abstenção de início de terapêuticas que suportam a vida. Estes conceitos emergiram nas
últimas três décadas, numa tentativa de prevenir a instituição de
terapêuticas que não beneficiam o doente, prolongando apenas
a sua vida. Com a globalização, tem-se assistido a um aumento
gradual da interacção entre diferentes religiões. Estas apresentam
diferentes crenças e opiniões no que respeita a intervenção do
doente, médico e família nas DFV e mesmo sobre o tipo de DFV
e considerações éticas face à morte. A clarificação da religião do
doente pode levar a uma melhor comunicação entre o médico,
o doente e familiares permitindo uma tomada de decisões mais
consistente relativamente aos cuidados de fim de vida.
Downloads
Referências
Concelho Nacional de Ética para as Ciências da Vida. Parecer sobre os Aspectos Éticos dos Cuidados de Saúde relacionados com o final da vida (11/CNECV/95).
Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA 2003;290:790-797.
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. This Official Statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, March 1991. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:726-731.
Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, Cohen N, Lo B, Cooke M et al.Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:309-315.
Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
;155:15-20.
Vincent JL. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1626-1633.
Cardoso T, Fonseca T, Pereira S, Lencastre L. Life-sustaining treatment decisions in Portuguese intensive care units: a national survey of intensive care physicians. Crit Care 2003;7:R167-175.
Pochard F, Abroug F. End-of-life decisions in ICU and cultural specificities. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:506-507.
Vincent JL. Cultural differences in end-of-life care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:N52-55.
Blank RH. End-of-Life Decision Making across Cultures. J Law Med Ethics 2011; 39(2):201-214.
Gysels M, Evans N, Meñaca A, Andrew E, Toscani F, Finetti S et al. Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries. PLoS One 2012;7(4):e34188
Athanazio RA, Barbetta MC, Bitencourt AG, Neves FS, Torreão LA, Agareno S et al. Decisions about withholding and withdrawing treatment on terminal patients in intensive care units. Rev bras ter Intensiva 2005;17:181-184.
Sprung CL, Maia P, Bulow HH, Ricou B, Armaganidis A, Baras M et al. The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:1732-1739.
Wilkinson DJ, Truog RD. The luck of the draw: physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2013; Feb 22.
Bitencourt AG, Dantas MP, Neves FB, Almeida A, Melo R, Albuquerque L et al. Therapeutic Limitation Conducts in Intensive care Unit Patients. Rev bras ter Intensiva 2007;19:137-142.
Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:770-784.
Bulow HH, Sprung CL, Reinhart K et al. The world´s major religions´ points of view on end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:423-430.
Bulow HH, Sprung CL, Baras M, Carmel S, Svantesson M, Benbenishty J et al. Are religion and religiosity important to end-of- life decisions and patient autonomy in the ICU? The Ethicatt study. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38:1126-1133.
Pope John P, II. Evangelium Vitae. Origins 1995;24:689, 91-730.
Pauls M, Hutchinson RC. Bioethics for clinicians: 28. Protestant bioethics. CMAJ 2002;166:339-343.
The Holy Synod of the Church of Greece, Bioethics Committee (2007): Basic positions on the ethics of euthanasia. www.bioethics.org.gr
Hatzinikolaou N. Prolonging life or hindering death? An Orthodox perspective on death, dying and euthanasia. Christ Bioeth 2003;9:187-201.
Ganz FD, Benbenishty J, Hersch M, Fischer A, Gurman G, Sprung CL. The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study. J Med Ethics 2006;32:196-199.
Steinberg A, Sprung CL. The dying patient: new Israeli legislation. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:1234-1237.
Daar AS, al Khitamy AB. Bioethics for clinicians: 21. Islamic bioethics. CMAJ 2001;164:60-63.
Ebrahim AF. The living will (Wasiyat Al-Hayy): a study of its legality in the light of Islamic jurisprudence. Med Law 2000;19:147-160.
Sachedina A. End-of-life: the Islamic view. Lancet 2005;366:774-779.
Firth S. End-of-life: a Hindu view. Lancet 2005;366:682-686.
Keown D. End of life: the Buddhist view. Lancet 2005;366:952-955.
Meñaca A, Evans N, Andrew EV, Toscani F, Finetti S, Gómez-Batiste X, et al. End-of-life care across Southern Europe: A critical review of cultural similarities and differences between Italy, Spain and Portugal. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012;82(3):387-401.
Gonçalves J. Attitudes toward end-of-life situations other than euthanasia and assisted suicide among Portuguese oncologists. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18:1271-1277
Ficheiros Adicionais
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Medicina Interna
Acesso livre
