Population Study of the Green and Blue Priorities in an Emergency Department

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24950/rspmi.2512

Keywords:

Emergency Service, Hospital, Health Services Misuse, Patient Admission, Patient Discharge, Triage

Abstract

Introduction: The management of the Emergency Department (ED) is complex and multifactorial, and with a growing influx of patients, it is burdened with hospital overcrowding, longer wait times, professional burnout, and lower quality of care. Approximately 43% of cases in Portugal are classified as low-priority emergencies.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted in the ED of a district hospital in Portugal from October 2018 to May 2019. It included adults with green and blue priority in triage. Discharge destination and number of ED admissions were analysed, with associations examined in relation to age, mode of arrival, activation of the "via azul" (fast-track system), and access to primary healthcare services.

Results: We included 41 066 episodes, with the majority
being of green priority (99.9%). The majority of patients,
98.8%, were discharged to outpatient care. Frequent flyers
(≥ 4 admissions) made up 3.3% of the group and 0.3% were
high users (≥ 10 admissions). Analysis showed significant
associations of discharge destination with age, mode of arrival, and activation of the "via azul" (p <0.001). There was
also a significant association between number of admissions and age (p <0.001) and the number of admissions and access to primary healthcare services (p <0.001).

Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of different factors in the patient’s destination, showing a strong association between age and hospital admission. Furthermore, the mode of arrival to the ED and the activation of the "via azul" are also associated with the patient's discharge destination. However, further studies are needed to understand the systematic issues within the ED.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rocha PA. A Procura de Cuidados de Saúde Urgentes em Portugal [Tese de Mestrado em Evidência e Decisão em Saúde, Universidade Nova de Lisboa]. Lisboa: UNL; 2020.

Farrohknia N, Castrén M, Ehrenberg A, Lind L, Oredsson S, Jonsson H, et al. Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:42. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-42.

Ministério da Saúde, Grupo de Trabalho Serviços de Urgência. Relatório Grupo Trabalho – Serviços de Urgências: 2019. [consultado Set 2023] Disponível em: https://www.sns.gov.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/RELATORIO-GT-Urgências.pdf

Ministério da Saúde, Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde. Portal de Transparência do Serviço Nacional de Saúde. Atendimentos em Urgência Hospitalar por Triagem de Manchester, Dados 2018-2022. [consultado Set 2023] Disponível em: https://transparencia.sns.gov.pt/

Bernstein SL, Aronsky D, Duseja R, Epstein S, Handel D, Hwang U, et al. The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x.

Pines JM, Hilton JA, Weber EJ, Alkemade AJ, Al Shabanah H, Anderson PD, et al. International perspectives on emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:1358-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01235.x.

Direção-Geral de Saúde, Departamento de Qualidade na Saúde. Manual de Standards: Unidades de Urgência e Emergência. Cempalavras – Comunicação Empresarial. Lisboa:DGS; 2016.

Van den Heede K, Van de Voorde C. Interventions to reduce emergency department utilisation: A review of reviews. Health Policy. 2016;120:1337-49. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.10.002.

Lauks J, Mramor B, Baumgartl K, Maier H, Nickel CH, Bingisser R. Medical Team Evaluation: Effect on Emergency Department Waiting Time and Length of Stay. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0154372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154372.

Kauppila T, Seppänen K, Mattila J, Kaartinen J. The effect on the patient flow in a local health care after implementing reverse triage in a primary care emergency department: a longitudinal follow-up study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35:214-20. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1333320.

Weston V, Jain SK, Gottlieb M, Aldeen A, Gravenor S, Schmidt MJ, et al. Effectiveness of Resident Physicians as Triage Liaison Providers in an Academic Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18:577-84. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.1.33243.

Carret ML, Fassa AC, Domingues MR. Inappropriate use of emergency services: a systematic review of prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saude Publica. 2009;25:7-28. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009000100002.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.

Benjamin DJ, Berger JO, Johannesson M, Nosek BA, Wagenmakers EJ, Berk R, Bollen KA, et al. Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2:6-10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.

Benjamin DJ, Berger JO. Three Recommendations for Improving the Use of p-Values. Am Statistician. 2019;73:186-91. doi:

1080/00031305.2018.1543135.

Published

2024-09-12

How to Cite

1.
Prescott D, Brochado AI, Evangelista V, Carlos A, Corredoura AS. Population Study of the Green and Blue Priorities in an Emergency Department. RPMI [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 12 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];(XX). Available from: https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/2512

Most read articles by the same author(s)