Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis – Daily Practice in a Medical Ward for Two Years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24950/rspmi.899Keywords:
Peptic Ulcer/prevention and control, Physician's Practice Patterns, Stress, PhysiologicalAbstract
Introduction: The prevention of stress ulcers (SU) is well established in intensive care units, however, recently, this practice
has been extended to medical wards, despite little evidence to
support it. Its implementation is based on the association of
various risk factors, however, studies show that 56 to 71% of
patients under SU prophylaxis in medical wards have no such
criteria.
Objective: With this reality in mind, a trial was developed with
the intent to create, apply and audit the implementation of a
SU prophylaxis protocol in an Internal Medicine ward, over two
years.
Material and Methods: To this end, after reviewing the criteria
for SU prophylaxis in medical patients in 2011, an audit was
performed without previous notice followed by training of the
clinical staff. In 2012 and 2013 new audits were carried out.
Results: From 2011 to 2012, a statistically significant improvement in the guidance of patients was identified (57.8% to 70%),
however, there was a statistically significant setback from 2012
to 2013 (52.5%).
Discussion: The contributing factors for the improvement seen
from the first to the second audit may have been the elaboration of the SU prophylaxis protocol along with staff training.
Such improvement was dissipated in the third audit, probably
because of the controversy that surrounds this subject and the
absence of new training activities.
Conclusion: This trial intends to remind that not all hospitalized
patients have criteria for SU prophylaxis and that is important
to define protocols adapted to the reality of each institution as
well as maintaining permanent staff training.
Downloads
References
ASHP commission on therapeutics. ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:347-79.
Stollman N, Metz DC. Pathophysiology and prophylaxis of stress ulcer in intensive care unit patients. Journal of Critical Care. 2005;20:35-45.
Duerksen DR. Stress-related mucosal disease in critically ill patients. J Crit Care.
Sesler JM. Stress-related mucosal disease in the Intensive Care Unit. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007;18:119-26.
Navab F, Steingrub J. Stress ulcer: is routine prophylaxis necessary? Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:708-12.
Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, Marshall JC, Leasa D, Hall R, Winton TL, Rutledge F, Todd TJ, Roy P, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal
bleeding in critically ill patients. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:377-81.
Arthur Grube RR, Byron May D. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients not in intensive care units. Am J Health Syst Pharm.
;64:1396-400.
Heidelbaugh JJ, Inadomi JM. Magnitude and economic impact of inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-ICU hospitalized
patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2200-6.
Hussain S, Stefan M, Visintainer P, Rothberg M. Why do physicians prescribe stress ulcer prophylaxis to general medicine patients? South Med J. 2010;103:1103-10.
Amaral MC, Favas C, Alves JD, Riso N, Riscado, MV. Stress-related mucosal disease: Incidence of bleeding and the role of omeprazole in
its prophylaxis. 2010; 21: 386-388.
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis: Surgical Critical Care and Medical Critical Care Services at Orlando Regional Medical Center. Orlando: ORMC;
Fonseca T, Lopes D, Barreto P, Costa L, Dias VP. Inibição da secreção ácida num Serviço de Medicina Interna. Med Interna. 2013; 20:
-7
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Medicina Interna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Medicina Interna