A retrospective study of problems with physicians, experienced by patients undergoing haemodialysis, in an Internal Medicine Service
Keywords:
haemodialysis, costs, vascular access, Internal MedicineAbstract
Objectives and Methods: A retrospective study in patients with end-stage renal disease
(ESRD) in haemodialysis, was carried out in our Internal Medicine Department. Our goal
was to analyse the reasons for hospital admission and the impact that these patients represent in terms of bed occupation.
Results: During the 15 months’ timeframe 4.5% of the hospitalisations in the department were due to patients with ESRD, 49.7% of whom underwent haemodialysis. In the haemodialysed
patients 26.0% started haemodialysis during hospitalisation and in 19.2% there was loss of
vascular access. The studied group’s mortality rate (MR) was 23.3% (Department MR: 8.9%)
and the average length of stay (LOS) was 16.4
days (Department LOS: 9.8 days). In the patients with loss of vascular access, the MR was
33.3% and LOS was 24.7 days. In those who started haemodialysis in hospital, the MR was 21.1%
and the LOS was 23.4 days. Among the factors contributing to the increased length of stay were
delays in the programming, execution and revision of vascular access by medical and surgical sub-specialities. In 71.4% of patients with loss of vascular access the delay in the construction of vascular access was greater than a
week and in 57.1% this delay exceeded two weeks. In the patients with inaugural haemodialysis, these values were 64.3% and 28.6%.
Conclusion: Patients with ESRD on haemodialysis impose a substantial load on Internal Medicine Departments. There are difficulties in the articulation with sub-specialities, with negative clinical and financial consequences. These
faults need correction, namely through the establishment of multidisciplinary approach protocols.
Downloads
References
Becker BN, Breiterman White R, Nylander W et al. Care pathway reduces hospitalizations and cost for hemodialysis vascular access surgery.Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30:525-531.
Kshirsagar AV, Hogan SL, Mandelkehr L, Falk RJ. Length of stay and costs for hospitalized hemodialysis patients: nephrologists versus internists. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11:1526-1533.
McFarlane PA, Mendelssohn DC. A call to arms: economic barriers tooptimal dialysis care. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20:7-12.
Hakim R, Himmelfarb J. Hemodialysis access failure: a call to action.Kidney Int 1998; 54:1029-1040.
Ascher E, Gade P, Hingorani A et al. Changes in the practice of angioaccess surgery: impact of dialysis outcome and quality initiative recommendations. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31:84-92.
Cull DL, Taylor SM, Russel HE, Langan EM, Snyder BA, Sullivan TM.The impact of community-wide vascular access program on the management of graft thromboses in a dialysis population of 495 patients.Am J surg 1999; 178:113-116.
Jassal SV, Brissenden JE, Raisbeck A, Roscoe JM. Comparative costanalysis of two different chronic care facilities for end-stage renal disease patients. Geriatr Nephrol Urol 1998; 8:69-76.
Arnold WP. Improvement in hemodialysis vascular access outcomes in a dedicated access center. Semin Dial 2000; 13:359-363.
Eknoyan G, Levin NW. An overview of the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative Implementation. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1999; 6:3-6.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Medicina Interna