A Critical Evaluation of Pneumonia Mortality in an Internal medicine Service of the “Padre Américo” Hospital – Vale do Sousa
Keywords:
pneumonia, mortality, prognosis, quality of physician-careAbstract
Introduction: Pneumonia is still a serious illness in spite of the use of potent antimicrobials
and effective vaccines. Correct diagnosis and prognostic evaluation are amongst the most
important steps for successful management.
Goals/ Methods: In this study 126 deaths in patients, in whom the main diagnosis was pneumonia, were characterized. The study period was from 1999 to 2001. Clinical, laboratory, radiographic and microbiological data was collected from
the records in clinical files. The adequacy of two
methods of assessing prognosis was also evaluated as well as the quality of physician care.
Statistics were handled using SSPS 11.0.
Results and Discussion: The majority of patients were male and the mean age found was 77.6±11.0 years. The most important adverse prognostic features present in the patients were:
respiratory rate>30/minute, admission diastolic blood pressure<60mmHg, mental confusion,
acidaemia and urea and creatinine plasmatic
levels above 50 and 1.2 mg/dL, respectively. No
pathogen was identified in 60% of the cases. A
significant number of patients were categorised as having a bad prognosis by both methods
applied, making them equally useful in the admission decision process. There was an agreement between the BTS and PORT scales. The initial approach lacked quality in the blood gas
and aetiologic evaluation, in the delay in starting antibiotic therapy and in the low rates of
vaccination. The use of a pneumonia protocol is supported.
Downloads
References
Barlett JG, Dowell SF, Mandell LA, File TA, Musher DM, Fine, MJ. Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:347-382.
Ministério da Saúde. Elementos estatísticos de saúde. 1997.
Niederman MS, Mandell LA, Anzueto A, Bass JB, Broughton WA, Campbell GD et al. Guidelines for the management of adults with
community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163: 1730-1754.
Castro H, Soares JA. Mortalidade num serviço de medicina, 2002
British Thoracic Society. BTS guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults admitted to hospital. Thorax
; 56 (suppl IV): 1-56.
Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM et al. A prediction rule to identify low risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med
;336: 243-250.
Campbell, GD. Overview of community-acquired pneumonia: prognosis and clinical features.Med Clin North Am 1994;78: 1035-1048.
Nogare AR. Nosocomial pneumonia in the medical and surgical patient: risk factors and primary management. Med Clin North Am 1994;78:
-1090.
Dean NC, Silver MP, Bateman KA, et al. Decreased mortality after implementation of a treatment guideline for community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med 2001;110:451-457.
Marrie TJ, Lau CY, Wheeler SL, et al. A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA
;283:749-755
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Medicina Interna