Transient Hepatic Elastography and Detection of Clinically Significant Esophageal Varices

Authors

  • Ana Catarino Serviço de Medicina Interna, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Hospital de Vila Real, Portugal
  • Carmen Pais Serviço de Medicina Interna, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Hospital de Vila Real, Portugal
  • Renata Silva Serviço de Medicina Interna, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Hospital de Vila Real, Portugal
  • Nuno Silva Serviço de Medicina Interna, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Hospital de Vila Real, Portugal
  • Paulo Carrola Serviço de Medicina Interna, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Hospital de Vila Real, Portugal
  • José Presa Unidade de Hepatologia, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Hospital de Vila Real, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24950/rspmi/O274/16/2017

Keywords:

Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Esophageal and Gastric Varices, Hypertension, Portal, Liver Cirrhosis

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal varices (EV) are a complication
of portal hypertension, and its rupture is associated with
a high mortality rate. The use of non-invasive diagnostic
methods, including hepatic elastography, have been under
investigation.
Aim: Evaluate the usefulness of transient hepatic elastography
as a non-invasive test for the prediction of presence
of EV, to avoid systematic screening with esophagogastroduodenoscopy
in a selected group of patients.
Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of the patients
of our Hepatology Unit with a hepatic elastography value >13
kPa who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy within
18 months of its evaluation.
Results: We included 259 patients (80.7% males), with a
medium age of 57.9 ± 9.8 years; 65.3% had EV (52.1%
grade II-III). We built ROC curves correlating hepatic elastography
value and presence of EV, and obtained an area
under the curve (AUC) for presence of EV of 0.755 (cut-off
>26.6 kPa, sensitivity 81.1%, specificity 64.4%) and AUC
of 0.68 (cut-off > 28,1 kPa, sensitivity 82.9%, specificity
49.7%) for grade II-III EV. For viral cirrhosis we obtained
AUC of 0.83 for presence of EV (cut-off > 19.8 kPa, sensitivity
95.4%, specificity 62.2%) and AUC of 0.69 for grade
II-III EV (cut-off > 19.8 kPa, sensitivity 94.7%, specificity
42.0%). In patients without splenomegaly or thrombocytopenia,
AUC was 0.89 (cut-off > 26.6 kPa, sensitivity 86.3%,
specificity 81.8%) for presence of EV and 0.75 (cut-off >
26. 6kPa, sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 60.6%) for grade IIIII EV.
Conclusion: Hepatic elastography values and presence of
EV were related, with a higher significance in the groups of
viral cirrhosis and those without splenomegaly or thrombocytopenia. Cut-off points had high sensitivity, illustrating the
potential utility of transient hepatic elastography in identifying
patients who may not need to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63:743-52.

Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Berzigotti A, Abraldes JG. Measurement of portal pressure and its role in the management of chronic liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2006;26:348–62.

Bosch J, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC, Abraldes JG. The management of portal hypertension: Rational basis, available treatments and future options. J Hepatol. 2008;48:S68–S92.

Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann RJ, Fisher RL, Conn HO, Atterbury CE, Glickman M. Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. Hepatology. 1985;5:419–24.

D’Amico G, Luca A. Natural history clinical-haemodynamic correlations. Prediction of the risk of bleeding. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1997;11:243–56.

Binţinţan A, Chira RI, Mircea PA. Non-invasive ultrasound-based diagnosis

and staging of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis. A systematic review of the literature published in the third Millenium. Med Ultrason.

;15:116-24

Bințințan A, Chira RI, Bințințan VV, Nagy GA, Mânzat-Săplăcan MR, Lupșor- Platon M, et al. Value of hepatic elastography and Doppler indexes for predictions of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis. Med Ultrason. 2015;17:5-11.

Poynard T, Cales P, Pasta L, Ideo G, Pascal JP, Pagliaro L, et al. Beta-adrenergic- antagonist drugs in the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices. An analysis of data and prognostic factors in 589 patients from four randomized clinical trials. Franco-Italian Multicenter Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1532–8.

Imperiale TF, Chalasani N. A meta-analysis of endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. Hepatology. 2001;33:802–7.

Thabut D, Moreau R, Lebrec D. Screening for esophageal varices: Endoscopy, other tools, or endoscopy and other tools? Hepatology. 2008;47:1434-6.

Castera L, Pinzani M, Bosch J. Non invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using transient elastography. J Hepatol. 2012;56:696-703.

Zykus R, Jonaitis L, Petrenkienė V, Pranculis A, Kupcinskas L. Liver and spleen transient elastography predicts portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease: a prospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:183.

Abraldes JG, Araujo IK, Turón F, Berzigotti A. Diagnosing and monitoring cirrhosis: Liver biopsy, hepatic venous pressure gradient and elastography. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;35:488-95.

Şirli R, Sporea I, Popescu A, Dănilă M. Ultrasound-based elastography for the diagnosis of portal hypertension in cirrhotics. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:11542-51.

Sporea I, Raţiu I, Şirli R, Popescu A, Bota S. Value of transient elastography for the prediction of variceal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17: 2206–10.

Mueller S, Sandrin L. Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease. Hepat Med. 2010;2:49–67.

Vizzutti F, Arena U, Romanelli RG, Rega L, Foschi M, Colagrande S, et al. Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007;45:1290-7.

Li T, Qu Y, Yang B, Xue Y, Wang L. Evaluation of large esophageal varices in cirrhotics patients by transiente elastography: a meta-analysis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016;108:464-72.

Mori K, Arai H, Abe T, Takayama H, Toyoda M, Ueno T, et al. Spleen stiffness correlates with the presence of ascites but not esophageal varices in chronic hepatitis C patients. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:857-62.

Stefanescu H, Procopet B. Noninvasive assessment of portal hypertension in cirrhosis: Liver stiffness and beyond. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20: 16811–19.

Giunta M, Conte D, Fraquelli M. Role of spleen elastography in patients with chronic liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:7857-67.

Kim TY, Kim TY, Kim Y, Lim S, Jeong WK, Sohn JH. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography for predicting esophageal varices in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35:1373-81.

Additional Files

Published

2017-12-29

How to Cite

1.
Catarino A, Pais C, Silva R, Silva N, Carrola P, Presa J. Transient Hepatic Elastography and Detection of Clinically Significant Esophageal Varices. RPMI [Internet]. 2017 Dec. 29 [cited 2024 May 16];24(4):275-84. Available from: https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/756

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>