An evaluation of the appropriateness of admissions to an Internal Medicine Service using an Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol during the year 2004

Authors

  • Nuno Bernardino Vieira Interno do Internato Complementar de Medicina Interna, Serviço de Medicina, Sector I do Centro Hospitalar do Barlavento Algarvio, Portimão
  • Javier Rodriguez-Vera Assistente Hospitalar de Medicina Interna, Serviço de Medicina, Sector I do Centro Hospitalar do Barlavento Algarvio, Portimão
  • Maria José Grade Assistente Hospitalar de Medicina Interna, Serviço de Medicina, Sector I do Centro Hospitalar do Barlavento Algarvio, Portimão
  • Luísa Arez Assistente Hospitalar Graduado de Medicina Interna, Serviço de Medicina, Sector I do Centro Hospitalar do Barlavento Algarvio, Portimão
  • Rui Tomé Chefe de Serviço de Medicina Interna, Serviço de Medicina, Sector I do Centro Hospitalar do Barlavento Algarvio, Portimão
  • Carlos Santos Assistente Hospitalar Graduado de Medicina Interna, Serviço de Medicina, Sector I do Centro Hospitalar do Barlavento Algarvio, Portimão

Keywords:

Appropriateness evaluation protocol, appropriated admission, inappropriate admission

Abstract

Introduction: The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) is an
instrument to measure the appropriateness of admissions based on
criteria that permit classification of hospital admission as appropriate
or inappropriate. It also could be used to quantify and evaluate the
causes of inappropriate use of hospital resources.
Objective: Evaluate the appropriateness of hospital admissions of
patients admitted in a department of Internal Medicine during the year
of 2004, using the prospective version of the AEP.
Method: Prospective and random study of the patients admitted
in an Internal Medicine department during the year of 2004. We
analyzed demographic, clinical (readmissions, co-morbidility and
mortality) and administration parameters (hospitalization duration
and appropriateness of hospital admission using the AEP, including causes of inappropriateness).
Results: 72 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria with an average
age of 70.6 years. 42% were readmissions. The average hospital stay
was 7.2 days. Mortality rate was 11.3%. 20.8% of the admissions
were considered inappropriate because they did not fulfill any AEP
criteria. The most common reason for inappropriate admission was
to perform diagnostic exams or treatments that could have been
done on an outpatient basis (53.3%).The most common criteria of
appropriateness was the need for intravenous therapy (87%), followed
by the need for assisted ventilation (12.3%).
Conclusions: The AEP allows us to evaluate the appropriateness
of hospital admissions in a Health Unit, enabling better utilization of
resources. A 20,8% rate of inappropriate admissions was recorded,
similar to that found in other studies. The creation of a structure that
improves the study of outpatient utilization could decrease inappropriateness of inpatient admissions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mc Donagh MS, Smith DH, Goddard M. Measuring appropriate use of acute beds. A systematic review of methods and results. Health Policy 2000; 53: 157-184.

Peiró Moreno S, Portella E. Identificación del uso inapropriado de la hospitalización: la búsqueda de la eficiência. Med Clin (Barc) 1994; 103: 65-71.

Gertman PM, Restuccia JD. The AEP: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care 1981; 19: 855-871.

Peiró S, Meneu R, Rosello ML et al. Validez del protocolo de evaluación del uso inapropriado de la hospitalización. Med Clin. 1996; 107 (4): 124-129.

Restuccia J. Manual de Utilización del Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Fundación Avendis Donabedian. Barcelona 1995.

Rodriguez-Vera FJ, Alcoucer Díaz MR et al. Adecuación de los ingresos en un Servicio de Medicina Interna en un Hospital de segundo nível. Ann Med Ann Med Interna 1999; 16: 277-280.

Bentes M, Gonçalves ML, Santos M, Pina E. Design and development of a utilization review program in Portugal. Int J Qual Health Care 1995; 7: Int J Qual Health Care 1995; 7:201-212.

Cordero A, Águilla J, Massalana A, et al. Adequação dos Internamentos num Serviço de Medicina – Aplicação da Escala AEP. Acta Med Port. 2004; 17: 113-118;

Rodriguez-Vera FJ, Alcoucer Diaz MR, Pujol de la Lave E. Utilización del Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol en la evaluación del sobreuso de la hospitalización. Rev Clin Esp 2002; 202 (5): 301-302. Rev Clin Esp 2002; 202 (5): 301-302.

Sangha O, Schneeweiss S et al. Metric properties of the appropriateness evaluation protocol and predictors of inappropriate hospital use in Germany: an approach using longitudinal patient data. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 483-492.

Panis L, Verheggen F et al. To stay or not to stay. The assessment of appro To stay or not to stay. The assessment of appropriate hospital stay: a Dutch report. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 55-67.

Capalbo G, D’Andrea G, Volpe M et al. Appropriateness evaluation of short hospital admissions using the AEP (Italian Version). Ann Ig 2004; 16 (6): 759-765.

Lombard I, Lahmek P, Diene E et al. Cause of non-pertinent hospital stays: Cause of non-pertinent hospital stays: interobserver concurrent French version of the AEP. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2001; 49 (4): 367-375.

Schneeweiss S, Shanga O. An update of the German version of AEP metric properties and practical experiences. Chirurg 2001; 72 (2): 196-198.

Librero J, Peiró S, Ordinana R. Chronic comorbidility and outcomes of hospital care: lenght of stay, mortality, and readmissions at 30 and 365 days. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 171-179.

Moya-Ruiz C, Peiró S et al. Effectiveness of feedback to physicians in Effectiveness of feedback to physicians inreducing inappropriate use of hospitalization: a study in a Spanish hospital. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 305-312.

Rodriguez-Vera FJ, Marin Fernandez Y, Sanchez A et al. Adequación de los ingresos y estancias en un Servicio de Medicina Interna utilizando la version concurrente del AEP. An Med Interna. 2003 ; 20 (6): 297-300.

Kossovsky MP, Chopard P, Bolla F et al. Evaluation of quality improve- Evaluation of quality improvement interventions to reduce inappropriate hospital use. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 227-232.

Matorras GP, Pablo CM, Otero GL et al. Adequación de los ingresos en un Servicio de Medicina Interna de un Hospital de tercer nível. Med Clin 1990; Med Clin 1990;94 (8): 290-293.

Demir C, Teke K, Fedai T et al. Investigation of the correlation between Investigation of the correlation between inappropriate hospitalization and hospital stay rate: na application in medical clinics of a military hospital. Mil Med 2002 ; 167 (10): 817-820.

Castaldi S, Ferrari MR, Sabatino G et al. Evaluation of the appropriateness of Hospital use: the case of IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore di Milano, Italy. Ann Ig 2002; 14 (5): 399-408.

Rodriguez-Vera FJ, Pujol de la Llave E. Inappropriate admissions. J R Soc Med 2002; 95: 111.

Callejas J, Fernandez-Moyano A, Palmero C et al. Son realmente objectivos los critérios de adecuación de ingresso hospitalario del AEP? Med Clin. Med Clin.2002;118:15

Additional Files

Published

2006-12-29

How to Cite

1.
Vieira NB, Rodriguez-Vera J, Grade MJ, Arez L, Tomé R, Santos C. An evaluation of the appropriateness of admissions to an Internal Medicine Service using an Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol during the year 2004. RPMI [Internet]. 2006 Dec. 29 [cited 2024 May 20];13(4):235-40. Available from: https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1655

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>